How the valuation, sections 294 to 297a ABGB and ownership evidence determine which fitted items and machinery are included in an auction.
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte
Salzburg law firm for real estate, corporate law and civil proceedings
We review the court file and property documents, explain the likely legal and financial consequences, and agree the next step with you.
Not every item located on a property is automatically sold with it at an Austrian judicial auction. The decisive issue is whether an item is a component or appurtenance of the property, remains an independent movable item or demonstrably belongs to a third party. This distinction can affect the valuation, bid and later handover, particularly for fitted kitchens, heating systems, photovoltaic equipment, workshop installations and machinery.
Bidders should therefore review more than photographs and inspection notes. They need the description in the court valuation, the legal connection to the property, the apparent long-term dedication, ownership evidence and any relevant land register notation. Unresolved items belong in a separate fixture schedule before any bid is made.
Select only the documented file position. The result does not replace legal review of the specific item.
Already know you want to speak with a lawyer? Go straight to the contact form.
Inclusion in the valuation is an important starting point. Confirm that the description, assessment, photographs and auction conditions identify the same item. Base the bid only on a traceable file position.
Match the contract, invoice, payment status, serial number and any land register notation to the precise item. An assertion or ownership label does not resolve title by itself.
Obtain complete contracts, invoices and technical identification data. Only a comparison with the valuation, land register and actual installation reveals the legal question that must be examined.
Sections 294 and 297 ABGB focus on connection, continued use and apparent dedication to the whole. Technical removability alone is not decisive. Document fitting, function and allocation.
If an item is independently movable and neither described as an appurtenance nor durably allocated, do not assume that it will remain. Exclude it from the value and intended use until the position is clarified.
Record dated photographs, precise location, fastening, connections, function, manufacturer data and the corresponding valuation entry. This evidence prepares the legal classification.
Section 140(3) EO requires appurtenances located on the property to be described and valued together with the property. It refers to sections 294 to 297a ABGB for the underlying classification. The fixture issue therefore belongs in the court valuation process, not only in a dispute after the award.
Section 141 EO fixes the valuation date at the date of inspection. Bidders should establish whether the item was present, identifiable and valued individually or as part of an installation on that date. Later photographs may show discrepancies but do not replace review of the court file.
The article on reviewing the court valuation explains how to arrange the valuation date, property description and possible objections. Fixtures add a second issue: the description and value must be attributable to the specific item.
An item may be technically removable and still qualify as an appurtenance. A loose item is not included merely because it is located on the property.
| Starting position | Important evidence | Review question |
|---|---|---|
| Fitted item | Photographs, fastening, connections, valuation | Is it dedicated to the lasting use of the whole? |
| Business equipment | Function, type of operation, inventory, assessment | Does the special allocation in section 296 ABGB apply? |
| Third-party machinery | Land register notation, contract, serial number | Does the exception in section 297a ABGB apply? |
| Loose movable item | Ownership evidence, location, separate use | Is there no lasting allocation to the property? |
This matrix organises the file. The legal classification depends on the specific item and its documented allocation.
Section 294 ABGB defines appurtenances by a lasting connection and also covers ancillary items required for, or dedicated to, the continued use of the principal thing. This demands more than asking whether an item can be removed with tools.
Section 297 ABGB refers to buildings, physically fixed items and things dedicated to the lasting use of a whole. For a fitted kitchen, heating equipment, charging installation or photovoltaic components, the fitting, function, contractual position and apparent long-term dedication must be established. Classify each item by fitting, function, contractual position and intended permanence.
For agricultural or business properties, section 296 ABGB contains a particular rule for products, livestock, tools and equipment required for the ordinary continuation of operations. General photographs or a brief inventory are insufficient for such properties.
Section 297a ABGB provides a special exception for machinery connected to immovable property. With the landowner’s consent, the public register may note that the machinery belongs to another person. The provision adds conditions for replacement machinery and limits the notation in time, while insolvency or judicial auction proceedings suspend expiry.
A lease agreement, invoice or ownership label should therefore not be read in isolation. Review the current land register, precise machinery description, serial number, installation point, chain of contracts and payment status. The documents must identify the actual item.
The absence of a notation does not by itself prove that every machine belongs to the enforcement debtor or is included in the auction. Conversely, an assertion of third-party ownership does not make the court fixture schedule irrelevant. Identify and resolve the contradiction before bidding.
Each step separates the file position, actual condition and ownership assertions.
Compile the name, image, location, condition and value assigned.
Document discrepancies, removal, replacement and missing identification data.
Match evidence concerning third-party machinery to the precise item.
Cross-check invoices, leasing, retention of title and serial numbers.
Include only supportable values in the intended use and maximum bid.
Obtain the valuation, summary, images, edict and auction conditions from the court file. The article on reviewing the auction edict explains why the property, conditions and personal assumptions must remain separate. Add a current land register extract and record the page reference for every item.
For the actual condition, use dated photographs, inspection notes, fastening, connections, functional description, manufacturer, model and serial number. For alleged third-party ownership, add complete contracts, invoices, payment evidence, correspondence and the identity of the alleged owner.
Arrange each item in four columns: file description, actual condition, ownership evidence and unresolved legal question. The auction file check helps identify missing document groups. Final classification remains specific to the individual case.
Arrange the valuation date, property description and possible objections.
Combine the property, court file, bid and award.
Identify missing documents and unresolved fixture issues.
Separate unresolved positions and a private reserve before the hearing.
Call the firm or send us an email. We will review your enquiry and contact you.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000