When an overbid after the award is admissible, which 14-day period and security apply, and how the existing buyer may respond.
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte
Salzburg law firm for real estate, corporate law and civil proceedings
We review the court file and property documents, explain the likely legal and financial consequences, and agree the next step with you.
An overbid can displace an award that has already been granted after an Austrian judicial auction. This option exists only within a narrow statutory framework. The relationship between the highest bid and the court valuation, the amount of the new offer, a short filing period and timely security are decisive.
For the existing buyer, a possible overbidder, the owner and creditors, this opens a separate intermediate procedure. Sections 195 to 199 EO govern when an overbid is admissible, how the existing buyer may respond and what follows once acceptance becomes final.
Select the documented position. The result arranges the appraised value, overbid, security and response of the successful bidder.
Already know you want to speak with a lawyer? Go straight to the contact form.
Section 195(1) EO permits an overbid only if this threshold has not been reached.
If the highest bid reaches three quarters of the valuation, section 195(1) EO does not permit an overbid. Verify the valuation, accessories and highest bid from the court file. Other remedies have different requirements.
The overbid must exceed the previous highest bid by at least one quarter. The court rejects an indefinite overbid without inviting correction. Arrange the award order, highest bid and proposed amount.
The filing period runs from public notice of the award. Obtain the edict database notice, award order, valuation and auction conditions.
Review the 14-day filing period, the offer of security and any provincial land transfer requirements together. The overbid cannot be withdrawn. Security must be lodged within seven days after the court request.
Section 195(1) EO ties the overbid to a clear value threshold. The awarded highest bid must be less than three quarters of the appraised value of the property and its accessories. If that threshold is reached, the auction cannot be made ineffective by an overbid.
The overbidder must also undertake to pay a price that exceeds the previous highest bid by at least one quarter. The overbidder must be able to comply with the existing auction conditions and must not be subject to an obstacle that would have excluded that person from bidding at the hearing.
The two calculations must be made separately. First compare the highest bid with three quarters of the court valuation. Only if that gateway is passed should the new offer be tested against 125 percent of the previous highest bid.
The requirements answer different questions and both must be met.
| Review step | Test | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Gateway threshold | Highest bid below three quarters of the valuation | An overbid may in principle be possible |
| Amount of overbid | New price at least one quarter above the previous highest bid | Minimum increase is met |
| Personal eligibility | No obstacle excluding the person from bidding | Overbidder may be considered |
The court file, valuation, award and specific overbid determine whether the requirements are met.
Section 196(1) EO requires the overbid to be filed with the enforcement court within 14 days after public notice of the award. The relevant event is not merely the auction hearing or private knowledge of its outcome.
The file should contain the specific notice, its date, the award order and reliable proof of receipt by the court. Contacting the firm, notifying another participant or preparing a draft does not file the overbid with the competent court.
The statute expressly prohibits withdrawal of an overbid. It must not be treated as a non-binding reservation. Financing, security, auction conditions and any land transfer requirements should be settled before filing.
Together with the overbid, the person must offer to secure one quarter of the proposed purchase price. Section 196 EO provides for judicial or notarial lodging of cash or savings certificates within seven days after the court request.
The overbid becomes effective only when the offered security has actually been lodged and proof has been supplied to the court. A bank financing letter or a sufficient account balance does not replace this statutory step.
Failure to provide security or to comply with a correction order exposes the overbidder to an administrative fine of up to EUR 10,000. An indefinite overbid is rejected without an opportunity to correct it. Amount, declaration and security offer must therefore be clear when filed.
The procedure contains several separate court decisions.
The 14-day filing period starts with public notice.
Minimum amount, conditions and the offer of security must comply.
The statutory seven-day period runs after the court request.
That buyer may increase the highest bid to the overbid amount within three days.
Once acceptance is final, the former award is set aside and the overbidder receives the award.
Section 197 EO gives the existing buyer a short opportunity to respond. After the last timely secured overbid has been communicated, the buyer may increase the highest bid to the amount of the highest overbid within three days.
The declaration must be filed in writing or recorded before the enforcement court. It cannot be withdrawn once the written declaration has arrived or the record has been closed. An informal message to the overbidder is insufficient.
If the buyer increases the bid in time, section 198 EO requires all overbids to be rejected. Otherwise, the highest offer among several overbidders prevails. If offers are equal, the one received first takes priority.
Once judicial acceptance of the overbid becomes final, the earlier auction loses effect under section 199 EO. The court sets aside the earlier award of its own motion and grants the award to the successful overbidder. No further overbid is allowed against this new award.
The successful overbidder is treated as the buyer from the date of the new award. That person must perform the statutory obligations of a buyer and is entitled from that date to the benefits assigned by law. The former buyer’s security and amounts already paid are returned as provided by section 199 EO.
The persons listed in section 198(2) EO may appeal the decision accepting the overbid. A party who appealed the original award must note the interaction: failure to challenge acceptance of the overbid is treated as withdrawal of the earlier appeal.
The file should contain the valuation, award order, public notice, auction conditions and proof of the previous highest bid. The proposed new price and one quarter of that price should be calculated transparently.
For security, arrange bank documents, source and availability of funds, and practical preparation for judicial or notarial lodging. If provincial land transfer law applies, the required declarations or approvals must also be reviewed early.
The buyer hub, court valuation glossary entry and buyer checklist provide a structure. Later payment is covered separately in the article on the highest bid after the award.
Review objection, refusal and appeal separately from an overbid.
Understand the payment period, interest and consequences of default.
Arrange the court file, financing and documents.
Review the property, bid, award and next steps.
Call the firm or send us an email. We will review your enquiry and contact you.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000