Prepare continuation
Connect the document with the enforcement title and file number. The application to the enforcement court should identify the transfer, the former party and the current stage of the proceeding.
Latest
Creditor change in an enforcement proceeding: assignment proof and continuation request
How a change of enforcing creditor after an assignment must be proved and what sections 9 and 10 EO mean for continuation.
Your law firm
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte
Salzburg law firm for real estate, corporate law and civil proceedings
We review the court file and property documents, explain the likely legal and financial consequences, and agree the next step with you.
14 September 2026, Mag. Bernhard Brandauer, Rechtsanwalt
If a titled claim is assigned during enforcement against real property, the new creditor must prove the change to the enforcement court with documents. A private assignment agreement alone therefore does not answer whether enforcement can continue in favour of the new creditor.
Section 9 EO requires public or publicly certified documents proving that the claim recognised in the enforcement title has passed to the person seeking enforcement. If that proof cannot be produced, section 10 EO requires a court judgment before enforcement is authorised or continued. The document and the current stage of the case are the starting points.
Creditor change in the proceeding
Has the change on the creditor side been proved?
Order the document, title and procedural stage before seeking continuation.
Already know you want to speak with a lawyer? Go straight to the contact form.
What is already available for the creditor change?
All paths at a glance
Overview of all outcomes.
Order the court communication →
Identify the claim precisely
Compare parties, title, file number, claim scope and assignment document. If it remains unclear which titled claim was transferred, the continuation request is not reliably prepared.
Complete documentary proof
Check whether the transfer can be proved by a public or publicly certified document. Section 9 EO ties enforcement in favour of another person to this documentary proof. A private contract does not automatically satisfy that requirement.
Secure title and file stage
Secure the enforcement title, file number, former creditor designation and every communication about the alleged change. A payment demand does not by itself prove the transfer under section 9 EO.
What section 9 EO requires after an assignment
What section 9 EO requires after an assignment
Section 9 EO addresses enforcement in favour of a person other than the person named as entitled in the enforcement title. The claim recognised in the title must have passed from the named person to the person seeking enforcement or continuation.
Public or publicly certified documents must prove that transfer. This is a procedural requirement of its own. The new creditor should therefore bring the title, the exact claim description and the former party designation together with the assignment document.
Document review
Connect assignment, title and continuation request
Each document answers a different question about the party change.
| Document | Review question | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Enforcement title | Which claim is recognised? | Record the amount, parties and content of the title. |
| Assignment document | Has the claim passed? | Check the public or publicly certified form required by section 9 EO. |
| File number | Which case should continue? | Identify the specific enforcement proceeding. |
| Application | What should the court do? | Describe the transfer and requested continuation clearly. |
A document helps only when it connects the titled claim and the change of party in a traceable way.
Distinguish an assignment document from a private contract
Distinguish an assignment document from a private contract
A claim may pass under a contract. For enforcement in favour of the new creditor, the documentary proof required by section 9 EO is an additional issue. A private assignment agreement may be an important basis, but it does not automatically meet the special form required by section 9 EO.
Check whether the document clearly identifies the former and new creditor, debtor, enforcement title and transferred claim. For a partial assignment, it must also be clear which part of the titled claim is concerned.
Key point: Putting the new creditor's name on an invoice or payment demand does not replace documentary proof of the transfer under section 9 EO.
Procedure
Prepare the creditor change in four steps
This order keeps an incomplete proof separate from the continuation request.
- 011011
Identify the case
Secure the file number, court, former party and stage of the enforcement against real property.
- 022022
Reconcile the claim
Compare the enforcement title, claim scope and assignment document.
- 033033
Check the form
Review the public or publicly certified document required by section 9 EO.
- 044044
Request continuation
Set out the transfer and requested next step before the enforcement court.
What section 10 EO means when proof is missing
What section 10 EO means when proof is missing
If the documentary proof required by section 9 EO cannot be produced, section 10 EO requires a court judgment before enforcement is authorised or continued. The judgment is therefore the statutory route where the documentary proof is unavailable. It does not remove the need to assess the particular claim.
The new creditor should state what supports the alleged transfer and whether the required document is available. Trying to bridge a missing form requirement with a bare statement that the claim was purchased leaves the procedural basis incomplete.
Keep continuation, joinder and distribution separate
Keep continuation, joinder and distribution separate
A change of the enforcing creditor is different from a further creditor joining the proceeding. Section 139 EO addresses the situation in which additional creditors join an auction proceeding that has already been initiated. This article concerns the person to whom the already titled claim is said to have passed.
Ranking and later distribution of the highest bid require a separate review. For a party change, the title, transfer document, file number and procedural stage come first. The current file can be organised with the court-file review.
FAQ
Common questions about a creditor change
Is a private assignment agreement enough for continuation? +
Not automatically. Section 9 EO requires public or publicly certified documents proving that the titled claim passed to the new creditor. If that proof is missing, section 10 EO requires a court judgment before continuation.
Does the new creditor need a new enforcement title? +
The existing title remains the starting point. The key issue is whether the transfer of the claim recognised in that title is proved in the form required by section 9 EO. Section 10 EO applies where documentary proof is unavailable.
Is a creditor change the same as joinder under section 139 EO? +
No. A creditor change concerns a titled claim passing to another person. Section 139 EO concerns additional creditors joining an ongoing auction proceeding.
Subscribe to legal updates: Receive new articles and legal information from the firm with BRANDaktuellen Rechtsnews. Subscribe to the newsletter.
Continue in the portal
Continue the enforcement file with clarity
Topics
Creditor changeAssignment proofEnforcement proceedingContinuationReal-property enforcementEnforcement titleAssignmentJudicial auction
Questions about an upcoming auction?
Call the firm or send us an email. We will review your enquiry and contact you.
Contact
A direct line to the firm.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000